Legal Opinion

Lykins v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1926No. 19790PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is a proceeding in error to reverse the finding of the Public Utilities Commission. The matter involves an extension of the route provided for in certificate No. 285, heretofore issued by the Public Utilities Commission, between Portsmouth and intersection of inter-county highway No. 104 and state route No. 73, the extension being for a distance of approximately 25 or 30 miles, and running to the village of Peebles, in Adams county. Plaintiff in error, J. S. Lykins, is the owner of said certificate No. 285 and is the same individual who operates what is known as the Portsmouth-Dry Eun…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLain v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Eager v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Public Service Commission v. ByronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. A. & T. Motor Freight, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  5. In Re Application of W., C.F. N.R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API