Legal Opinion

McLain v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1924No. 18331PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This cause brings to this court for construction, among other things, an act “conferring jurisdiction upon the Public Utilities Commission over the transportation of persons or property for hire in motor vehicles, and providing for the supervision and regulation of such transportation,” found in 110 Ohio Laws, at page 211, passed March 29, 1923, filed in the office of the secretary of state April '28, 1923, and in effect July 27, 1923.

While the question of the status of the several applicants for certificates of convenience and neo essity, growing out of the different dates on which snch…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. West Suburban Transportation Co. v. Chicago & West Towns Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Choate v. Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Rapid Railway Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. People Ex Rel. N.Y.C., Etc., Co. v. . P.S. Com.New York Court of Appeals · 1909

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Furstenberg v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. N.Y. C. Rd. Co. v. P. U. C.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Lykins v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Scioto Valley Ry. & Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API