Legal Opinion

Eager v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1925No. 19319PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This case was heard by the Public Utilities Commission, after due notice, upon the application of the plaintiff in error for a certificate of convenience and necessity to operate a motor transportation company over the highway between Bryan, Ohio, and Waterloo, Ind.

The evidence of the applicant was heard, and the depositions of several persons in behalf of the applicant were received in evidence by the commission. The evidence rather fully disclosed' the character of the public transportation service now in operation between those points, and the industries in and the number of inhabitants of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. ShupeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Lykins v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Greyhound Corp., SE Greyhound Lines Div. v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  5. Arneson v. DennyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API