Legal Opinion

Ray-Simmons & McGouldrick v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 22, 2016No. 28/15PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, C.J.

We apply in this case Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), and its progeny to the State’s exercise of peremptory challenges and its subsequent explanations for making those challenges. We hold that, because the State’s explanation for one of its peremptory challenges was not neutral as to both race and gender, Petitioners are entitled to relief under Batson. We accordingly reverse the decision of the Court of Special Appeals and grant Petitioners a new trial.

I

Petitioners, Mashea Ray-Simmons and Antionette McGouldrick, were tried jointly with a third…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rhoden v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  2. Spencer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  3. Pietruszewski v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Bennett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Hart v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API