Legal Opinion

Spencer v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 29, 2016No. 94/15PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

In this case, Petitioner, Kevon Spencer (“Spencer”), challenges the trial judge’s finding that defense counsel’s explanations for striking jurors, in light of a Batscm Challenge, were a pretext for racial discrimination. Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 97-98, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 1723-24, 90 L.Ed.2d 69, 88-89 (1986). Spencer argues that defense counsel provided valid, race neutral explanations; however, the trial judge did not point to evidence, on the record, to support the court’s finding that the challenged party’s explanation was a pretext for racial discrimination. Thus, the presiding judge,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Koushall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Koushall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Bennett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. In re: David P.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Koushall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API