Spencer v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.
In this case, Petitioner, Kevon Spencer (“Spencer”), challenges the trial judge’s finding that defense counsel’s explanations for striking jurors, in light of a Batscm Challenge, were a pretext for racial discrimination. Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 97-98, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 1723-24, 90 L.Ed.2d 69, 88-89 (1986). Spencer argues that defense counsel provided valid, race neutral explanations; however, the trial judge did not point to evidence, on the record, to support the court’s finding that the challenged party’s explanation was a pretext for racial discrimination. Thus, the presiding judge,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Koushall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Koushall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- In re: David P.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Koushall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022