Legal Opinion
Pietruszewski v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 7, 2020No. 0209/18PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Bruce Edward Pietruszewski v. State of Maryland No. 209 September Term, 2018 Opinion by Meredith, J. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – JURY TRIALS – PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES TO POTENTIAL JUROR – RIGHT OF COUNSEL IN CRIMINAL CASES TO STRIKE JURORS AFTER THE JUROR HAS BEEN CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTED AND SEATED IN THE JURY BOX. Maryland Rule 4-313(b) describes two alternative procedures for exercising peremptory challenges to strike prospective jurors. If no request is made to the contrary, each party shall exercise its challenges simultaneously by striking names from a copy of the jury list. But, at the request of…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harriston v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020