Legal Opinion
Del Oro Hills v. City of Oceanside
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 23, 1995No. D017139PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.
The initial questions posed by this appeal as to the validity of a residential growth control initiative, chapter 32A of the City of Oceanside Municipal Code, commonly known as Proposition A (Prop. A), adopted by the voters of the respondent City of Oceanside (the City), were answered by this court in our opinion filed July 19, 1994, in Building Industry Assn, (also referred to as BIA) v. City of Oceanside (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 744 [33 Cal.Rptr.2d 137] (hereafter Building Industry II or the BIA opinion). In the BIA matter, with which this case was consolidated, the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Landgate, Inc. v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Toigo v. Town of RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Sinclair Oil Corp. v. County of Santa BarbaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Howard v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. SumahitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.