Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Arreola v. County of Monterey

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 2002No. H021339PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, Acting P. J.

Defendants, County of Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (collectively Santa Cruz), Monterey County Water Resources Agency (MCWRA), and County of Monterey (Monterey), were found hable in tort and inverse condemnation for extensive damage caused when the Pajaro River Levee Project (the Project) failed during a heavy rainstorm in 1995. Defendant State of California (State) was also found liable in tort and inverse condemnation for damage caused when Highway 1 obstructed the path of the floodwater on its way to the sea. For…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Merck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Litz v. Maryland Department of the EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  3. Bookout v. State of California Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. AGCS Marine Ins. Co. v. Arlington Cnty.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  5. Tilton v. Reclamation District No. 800California Court of Appeal · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API