Champagne v. Hygrade Food Products, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEILL, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, in this civil rights (claim of racial discrimination in employment) case, has moved for an order under Rule 30(b)(4) to take oral depositions by non-stenographic means. Plaintiff also seeks approval to rec- or(j the proceedings by a separate tape recorder. Defendants object, asserting that use 0f tape recordings is cumbersome and time consuming. The Court has considered the memoranda submitted by the parties.
Plaintiff’s motion specifies the procedures for and conditions under which he proposes to record the testimony as:
1. Plaintiff shall use…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colonial Times, Inc., D.B.A. The Daily Rag v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Kallen v. Nexus Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Marlboro Products Corp. v. North American Philips Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Lucas v. CurranDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Wescott v. NeemanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sanchez v. District Court Ex Rel. County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Jones v. EvansDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982