Legal Opinion

Wescott v. Neeman

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided July 3, 1972No. Civ. No. 72-L-117PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DENNEY, District Judge.

On June 8, 1972, this Court granted plaintiff’s motion to take depositions by other than stenographic means (tape recording). It is the purpose of this memorandum and order to set forth the manner of recording, preserving and filing the deposition, as well as provisions to assure that the recorded testimony will be accurate and trustworthy. See Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 30(b) (4).

It has only been since July 1, 1970, when Rule 30(b) (4) became effective, that non-stenographic means of taking depositions have been authorized. Since that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carson v. Burlington Northern Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1971
  2. Kallen v. Nexus Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colonial Times, Inc., D.B.A. The Daily Rag v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. Sanchez v. District Court Ex Rel. County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. United States v. LaFatchDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1974
  4. Lucas v. CurranDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Champagne v. Hygrade Food Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API