Legal Opinion

Marlboro Products Corp. v. North American Philips Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 10, 1972No. 72-Civ. 830PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKEL, District Judge.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b) (4), adopted in 1970, provides:

“The court may upon motion order that the testimony at a deposition be recorded by other than stenographic means, in which event the order shall designate the manner of recording, preserving, and filing the deposition, and may include other provisions to assure that the recorded testimony' will be accurate and trustworthy. If the order is made, a party may nevertheless arrange to have a stenographic transcription made at his own expense.”

The plaintiff, suing for $150,000 ($50,000 trebled) upon alleged violations…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carson v. Burlington Northern Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1971
  2. Kallen v. Nexus Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Colonial Times, Inc., D.B.A. The Daily Rag v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. Sanchez v. District Court Ex Rel. County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Rice's Toyota World, Inc. v. Southeast Toyota Distributors, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
  4. United States v. LaFatchDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1974
  5. Perry v. Mohawk Rubber Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API