Legal Opinion
Kallen v. Nexus Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 8, 1972No. 71 C 569PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER and MEMORANDUM OPINION
AUSTIN, District Judge.
This is a federal antitrust action brought on behalf of a class of persons who have taken and will take a bar review course offered by defendants. Before the court is plaintiffs’ “Motion for an Order Determining that Future Discovery Taken in this Action be Taken by other than Stenographic Means.”
As amended on March 30, 1970, and effective July 1, 1970, Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides in part:
Rule 30(b) (4). The court may upon motion order that the testimony at a deposition be recorded by other than stenographic…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carson v. Burlington Northern Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1971
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Galley v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
3Cited by16 opinions
- Colonial Times, Inc., D.B.A. The Daily Rag v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Sanchez v. District Court Ex Rel. County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Sayre v. Abraham Lincoln Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- People v. MoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- United States v. LaFatchDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.