Legal Opinion

Fisher Et Ux. v. City of Phila.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1933No. Appeal 72, 73, 74 and 75PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

These four appeals grow out of one action and will be disposed of in one opinion.

Harry Fisher and Anna Fisher, his wife, (appel-lees in Nos. 75 and 73, respectively), brought an action of trespass in the municipal court against the City of Philadelphia to recover the damages sustained by them respectively in consequence of a fall by Mrs. Fisher on February 13, 1928, caused ¡by the defective condition of a sidewalk along Anderson Street, corner of East Chelten Avenue, Philadelphia; which defect had existed sufficiently long, it was claimed, to put the city upon…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Vinnacombe v. Phila. Am. S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Corbin v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. McLaughlin v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Kates's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bittle v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Knapp v. Bradford CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Wright Et Ux. v. ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Emmey v. Stanley Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Clineff v. Rubash (Goldsmith)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API