Legal Opinion

Kates's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1925No. Appeal, 204PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

The present testator had an estate of his own, and also a general power of appointment over a portion of the estate left by his father. His widow and two children survived him; the widow elected to take against his will, and claimed to receive one-third of . both estates * the auditor decided she was only entitled to one-third of such property as the testator personally owned; the orphans’ court held otherwise and this appeal followed.

The father’s will provided that his residuary estate should be held in trust, the income to be divided equally between the present…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. O'Malley v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Holdship v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  4. Morgan'S EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Frick's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. March v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Borsch EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Melnick v. MelnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Fisher Et Ux. v. City of Phila.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Hagen's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API