Legal Opinion

Munson v. Chicago Great Western Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 1927No. 25,851PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, O.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries in which the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff and the defendant made a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, and the court granted the motion for judgment.

A public highway extending north and south crosses defendant’s railway track at grade and at nearly a right angle about one-fourth of a mile east of the station of Welch in Goodhue county. The county had a crew graveling a road north of the track and hauled the gravel from a gravel pit about 600 feet south of the track along this highway to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Rintala v. Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Jensen v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Bailey v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Richter v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dart v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Colby v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Lee v. MolterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Jones v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API