Jones v. Great Northern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff at ’a railway crossing in a collision with a train of the defendant and for damages to his auto which he was driving. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.
The evidence, though in dispute, sustains the finding necessarily included in the verdict that the defendant failed to give the crossing signals required by G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 1.0263, and that its failure was a proximate cause of the injury to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Rintala v. Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Jensen v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Bailey v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Anton v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rogge v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Lee v. MolterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Luce v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Hicks v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Carlson v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.