Legal Opinion

Rintala v. Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 1924No. 23,888PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action for personal injuries and property- damage sustained by plaintiff as the result of his attempt to cross defendant’s track in his motor truck ahead of a freight train. There was a verdict for plaintiff followed by a motion by defendant for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial. From the order denying that motion this appeal is taken.

The accident occurred at the village of Orr in St. Louis county on November 23, 1922. The highway in question is a village street crossing the raailway from east to west. The tracks, two in number, one the main line and the other a spur, lie in a northerly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Schneider v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Chicago Great Western R. v. BiwerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  4. McCarty v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Whiffin v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Rogge v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. State v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Turner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API