Jensen v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Action for personal injuries claimed to have been suffered by plaintiff as a result of the alleged negligence of defendant. A verdict was directed for defendant on the trial and plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial.
There is no real or substantial controversy in the evidence. Plaintiff was injured as a result of a collision between a railroad passenger train operated by defendant and a team and wagon driven *415by him at a road crossing over defendant’s line of railroad on the outskirts of the city of St. Paul, at about 5:30 o’clock p. m. on February 5, 1921. The road over which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Carlson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Schneider v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Medcalf v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Kemp v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lee v. MolterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Turner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Perkins v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Jones v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Anton v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.