Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 2, 1923No. 23,212PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Action for personal injuries claimed to have been suffered by plaintiff as a result of the alleged negligence of defendant. A verdict was directed for defendant on the trial and plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial.

There is no real or substantial controversy in the evidence. Plaintiff was injured as a result of a collision between a railroad passenger train operated by defendant and a team and wagon driven *415by him at a road crossing over defendant’s line of railroad on the outskirts of the city of St. Paul, at about 5:30 o’clock p. m. on February 5, 1921. The road over which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Carlson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Schneider v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Medcalf v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Kemp v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lee v. MolterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Turner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Perkins v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Jones v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Anton v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API