Legal Opinion

Ruby v. Debovsky

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1954No. Civ. 15943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

In an action for damages for alleged fraud, defendant’s answer alleged the defense of res judicata by reason of three specified actions. Pursuant to section 597, Code of Civil Procedure, this issue was tried separately. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment in favor of defendant upon that issue on a limited record.

Questions Presented

Plaintiffs raise many questions, most of which, however, cannot be determined from the limited record before us. The determinable questions are primarily whether the answer properly raises the issue of res judicata, and if so, whether the prior actions are res…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Newman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Tracy v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Caruthers v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eichman v. Fotomat Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. O'NEIL v. SpillaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Thibodeau v. CrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Sierra National Bank v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Greitzer v. United States National BankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API