Legal Opinion

State v. Behl

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 9, 1989No. 1 CA-CR 88-021PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHELLEY, Presiding Judge.

The only issue raised in this appeal is whether the defendant’s eighteen-year sentence must be served without possibility of parole (flat time) in accordance with A.R.S. § 13-1406(B) or whether the defendant is eligible for parole after serving two-thirds of the sentence in accordance with A.R.S. § 13-604(G).

FACTS

Defendant was charged by indictment with count one, kidnapping, a class two felony; count two, aggravated assault, a class three felony; and counts three and four, sexual assaults, class two felonies. Later the state filed an allegation of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Pima County v. HeinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. WagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. State v. TarangoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API