State v. Behl
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHELLEY, Presiding Judge.
The only issue raised in this appeal is whether the defendant’s eighteen-year sentence must be served without possibility of parole (flat time) in accordance with A.R.S. § 13-1406(B) or whether the defendant is eligible for parole after serving two-thirds of the sentence in accordance with A.R.S. § 13-604(G).
FACTS
Defendant was charged by indictment with count one, kidnapping, a class two felony; count two, aggravated assault, a class three felony; and counts three and four, sexual assaults, class two felonies. Later the state filed an allegation of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Pima County v. HeinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. WagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State v. TarangoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.