Legal Opinion

Hunsicker v. Thompson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1986No. S-799PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This appeal raises the question whether the trial court abused its discretion in failing to award full reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in public interest litigation. We reverse.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The facts giving rise to the appeal are not in dispute. Three candidates appeared on the ballot of a recent Mat-Su Borough School Board election. Patricia C. Hunsicker received a plurality of over 40% of the votes cast, entitling her to a seat on the Board. The Assembly of the Mat-Su Borough certified the results. The Assembly later discovered that one of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Tobeluk Ex Rel. Tobeluk v. LindAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Anchorage v. McCabeAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Girves v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Gold Bondholders Protective Council v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Valley Hospital Ass'n v. Mat-Su Coalition for ChoiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Alaska Survival v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Anchorage Daily News v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Kenai Chrysler Center, Inc. v. DenisonAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Laverty v. Alaska RR Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API