Laverty v. Alaska RR Corp.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Paul Laverty sued to block a contract allowing the Flamingo Brothers Partnership to extract gravel from Alaska Railroad Corporation (ARRC) land, alleging that the contract disposed of state land without prior public notice, in violation of the Alaska Constitution's Public Notice Clause. The superi- or court ruled that the constitution bars ARRC from disposing of its lands without public notice because they are "state lands" under the constitution. But the court denied declaratory relief, finding that the public received adequate notice through Flamingo…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Trustees for Alaska v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Kodiak Electric Ass'n v. Delaval Turbine, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Rockstad v. EriksonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Davin J. Anderson v. Alaska Housing Finance CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- Kollander v. KollanderAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Patel v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
- Leahy v. ConantAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.