Gold Bondholders Protective Council v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
In this case, the Gold Bondholders Protective Council (hereafter referred to as Bondholders) appeals the superior court’s award of $15,551.22 in attorneys’ fees and costs to appellee, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (hereafter referred to as Santa Fe).
The facts of the case from which this appeal arises are as follows:
In 1895, Santa Fe issued bonds for public sale. The bonds contained a “gold clause” which promised to pay to bondholders in the year 1995, the face amount in “gold coin of the United States, of the present standard of weight and fineness,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Cooper v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Anchorage v. McCabeAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Anchorage Daily News v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Hickel v. Southeast ConferenceAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Belluomini v. Fred Meyer of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Carr-Gottstein Properties v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.