Legal Opinion

Moore v. Webb

California Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14781PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Appeal from a judgment entered on an order sustaining without leave to amend the several demurrers of the defendants to the plaintiff’s complaint.

The plaintiff furnishes a motor club service under the name of Pacific National Automobile Association. In 1929 (Stats. 1929, chap. 818, amended 1931, chap. 165), the legislature passed an act defining and regulating so-called motor club service. By section 1 of the act such service is defined as the “rendering, furnishing, or procuring of towing service, emergency road service, insurance service, bail bond service, discount service,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central Lumber Co. v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Riley v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. In Re CardinalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. In Re RaleighCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. United States Automobile Service Club v. Van WinkleOregon Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hirsch v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Pauley v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  3. Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Estate of MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API