In Re Raleigh
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem.
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus wherein the petitioner seeks to test the validity of the act of the legislature approved June 1, 1917 (Stats. 1917, p. 1579), entitled “An act to define real estate brokers, agents, salesmen, solicitors; to provide for the regulation, supervision, and licensing thereof; to create the office of real estate commissioner and making an appropriation therefor. ’ ’ The act in question makes it unlawful for any person, copartnership, or corporation to engage in the business or act in the capacity of a real estate broker or real…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ex Parte SohnckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Rauer v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Ex parte BohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bacon Service Corporation v. Huss.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Ventura County Harbor District v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Ex Parte PopeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- In Re Application of FlesherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Mansur v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.