Central Lumber Co. v. South Dakota
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA. The facts, which involve, the constitutionality under the Federal Constitution of the “one price” statute of' the, State of South Dakota, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
The plaintiff in error was found guilty of unfair discrimination under Session Laws of South Dakota for 1907, c. 131, and was sentenced to a fine of two hundred dollars and costs. It objepted in due form that the statute was contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment, but on appeal' the judgment of the trial court was • sustained. 24 So. Dak. 136. . By the statute anyone “Engaged in the production, manufacture or distribution of any commodity in general use, that intentionally, for the purpose of destroying the competition of any regular, established dealer in such .commodity, or to prevent the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by172 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.