Legal Opinion
Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1
California Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 1944No. L. A. 18573PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
24 Cal.2d 796 (1944)
R. BERNARD DICKEY, Respondent,
v.
RAISIN PRORATION ZONE NO. 1 et al., Appellants.
L. A. No. 18573.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Aug. 31, 1944.
Francis M. Shea, Assistant Attorney General (U.S.), Charles H. Carr and Leo V. Silverstein, U.S. Attorneys, Ronald Abernethy, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Sidney J. Kaplan, Special Assistant Attorney General, Wm. F. Hall, W. S. Ward, Joseph A. Fanelli, Jerome C. Strumpf and Phyllis Campbell, Attorneys, Department of Justice, and Strother P. Walton for Appellants.
Walter M. Gleason, Morgan J. Doyle, William B. Acton and A. Dal Thomson…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
- Johnston v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stand up for California v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Stand up for California v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2016