Legal Opinion

JoAnn Fonzone v. Tribune Corp

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 9, 2015No. 13-4762UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

2Per curiam

Jo Ann Fonzone, proceeding pro se, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denying her motion to reopen her defamation action. For the reasons below, we will affirm.

In January 2011, Fonzone, a Pennsylvania citizen, filed a complaint in the District Court containing numerous claims arising from an allegedly libelous article about her that was published in The Morning Call, an Allentown newspaper, in May 2010. She asserted that the District Court had diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. But because the complaint did…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ahmed v. DragovichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Cephus Bell v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Richard J. Mayberry v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. Nos. 97-5735, 97-5736Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. G. Jang v. Boston Scientific SciMed IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. JoAnn Fonzone v. Tribune CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. MILLTOWN-FORD AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
  3. REED v. CITIGROUP, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  4. WILLIAMS v. SCI-FAYETTEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API