Legal Opinion
G. Jang v. Boston Scientific SciMed Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 5, 2013No. 12-3434PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal concerns a multimillion-dollar contract dispute over the distribution of profits from medical patents. In particular, it involves U.S. Patent No. 5,922,021 (“the '021 patent”), awarded to appellant G. David Jang for coronary stent technology. Jang, a doctor and inventor, sued Boston Scientific Corporation (“BSC”), the company to which Jang assigned his coronary stent patents, for breach of the patent assignment agreement (“Agreement”). The Agreement requires BSC to share profits from the patents with Jang, including any damages it recovers from…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Burtch v. Milberg Factors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Fletcher-Harlee Corp. v. Pote Concrete Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Joan Mullin v. Karen BalickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Wolfington v. Reconstructive Orthopaedic Assocs. II PCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- United States Ex Rel. Customs Fraud Investigations, LLC v. Victaulic Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Trunzo v. Citi MortgageDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Mardi Harrison v. Bernard CokerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.