Legal Opinion
Richard J. Mayberry v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 7, 1977No. 76-2296PublishedCited by 199 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAYTON, Senior District Judge:
Once again we are asked to review the district court’s grant of relief, pursuant to Rule 60(b)(5) and (6), F.R.C.P. from a consent judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff class on January 18, 1973. Additionally, the plaintiff class has appealed from the refusal of the district judge to disqualify himself.
The facts surrounding this rather lengthy litigation are familiar to all concerned, and will be summarized only to the extent necessary in order to dispose of the issues presently before this Court. On July 29, 1966, plaintiff Mayberry brought this action…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by199 opinions
- Budget Blinds, Inc. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Jermont Cox v. Martin HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- HOUSING AUTHORITY OF TOWN OF MORRISTOWN v. LittleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Jessica T. And Halver L. Moolenaar v. Government of the Virgin Islands and Virgin Islands Port Authority. Appeal of Government of the Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Andrea Sawka v. Healtheast, Inc. And Richard DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.