In re Koehne
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as “defendant”) seeks a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that he is being illegally restrained of his liberty by the Chief of Police of the City of Los Angeles.
Facts: Defendant was convicted of violating section 41.27-(a) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, which provides in part: “No person shall be or appear in a state of drunkenness or intoxication upon any public street, sidewalk, highway or alley or in any public park, or in any railroad depot or bus station, or in any public place, or in any place open to the patronage of the public, or in any place…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Galvan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- In Re ZornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Hom v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.