Legal Opinion

Parks v. Clark

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1943No. 30942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

S. R. Clark and Mrs. S. R. Clark, husband and wife, sued Nellye M. Parks and others to cancel a resale tax deed to Seminole county, covering some 60 acres of land in that county, based on the April, 1939, tax resale, and also to cancel a commissioners’ deed to said Nellye M. Parks. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, .Nellye M. Parks appeals.

1. Plaintiffs argue that the resale deed to the county is void for three reasons, which we will dispose of in the order presented.

a. They first argue that the tax resale and the resale deed are invalid because in the resale notice the property was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phelps v. AsplundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Smith v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Pimm v. WaldronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Hefner v. CravensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Ted Parks, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Ray Ex Rel. Schulte v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Stephens v. Board of Com'rs of Pittsburg CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Parks v. Clark Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Garcia v. Ted Parks, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API