Pimm v. Waldron
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
Plaintiff .and defendant occupying the same relative position in 'this court as they did in the trial court, they will be referred to accordingly. Plaintiff brings his action against H. 10. Wal-dron, M. S. Ryan, as county treasurer of Oklahoma county, and others, but none save defendant PI. E. Waldron and M. S. Ryan are before this court in this appeal.
Plaintiff alleges he is the owner of certain lands in Oklahoma county and in the exclusive, adverse, complete, and undisturbed possession of the same. That the records in the county treasurer’s office show certain charges…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Continental Insurance v. PearceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
3Cited by8 opinions
- Swan v. KuehnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Deneen v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Bramble v. CaywoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Young v. BoswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Mahoney v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.