Legal Opinion

City of Oceanside v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 2000No. D034606PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDONALD, J.

The City of Oceanside (City) and Rodney Ferris (together with City, Defendants), defendants in a personal injury action brought by the real party in interest, plaintiff Tracie G. MacDonald, filed a petition for a peremptory writ of mandate seeking reversal of an order denying their motion for summary judgment. Defendants contend the firefighter’s rule applies as a matter of law and is a complete defense to MacDonald’s action. We agree and grant the petition.

Factual and Procedural Background

In July 1996 City lifeguards, including Ferris, and Camp Pendleton lifeguards,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Walters v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Neighbarger v. Irwin Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Calatayud v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. North County Transit DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Gregory v. CottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Hamilton v. Martinelli & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Gramercy Investment Trust v. Lakemont Homes Nevada, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Farnam v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API