Legal Opinion
Farnam v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 28, 2000No. G021552PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
101 Cal.Rptr.2d 642 (2000)
84 Cal.App.4th 1448
RonaId FARNAM, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. G021552.
Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three.
November 28, 2000.
Review Denied February 28, 2001.[*]
Gregory L. Bosse, Orange, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Daniel E. Lungren and Bill Lockyer, Attorneys General, Richard J. Rojo, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Martin Ageson and Barbara A. Noble, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents.
OPINION
RYLAARSDAM, J.
A police dog handled by defendant, Joseph Morrison, a California…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Sullivan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Coverstone v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Hardy v. VialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hamilton v. Martinelli & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Kindrich v. Long Beach Yacht ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Terry v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- McElroy v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Kindrich v. Long Beach Yacht ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008