Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Cott

California Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 2014No. S209125PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

The question in this case is whether patients suffering from Alzheimer’s disease are liable for injuries they inflict on health care *1000workers hired to care for them at home. Because agitation and physical aggression are common late-stage symptoms of the disease, injuries to caregivers are not unusual. California and other jurisdictions have established the rule that Alzheimer’s patients are not liable for injuries to caregivers in institutional settings. We conclude that the same rule applies to in-home caregivers who, like their institutional counterparts, are employed…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. L.C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Neighbarger v. Irwin Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. MathisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Gillen v. Boeing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Jimenez v. Roseville City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Fazio v. Fairbanks Ranch Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Moore v. William Jessup UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API