Legal Opinion

Neighbarger v. Irwin Industries, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1994No. S033049PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

—This case presents the question whether a private safety employee who has occasional firefighting duties may state a cause of action against a third party, not the employer, for injuries caused by the third party’s negligence in starting a fire. We conclude that a private safety employee may state such a cause of action, and that such a claim is not barred by the firefighter’s rule or the doctrine of assumption of risk.

Facts

Plaintiffs Craig Neighbarger and John Magana were employees of Powerine Oil Company. Neighbarger was employed as a safety supervisor and had special…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Krauth v. Israel Geller and Buckingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. Walters v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Vasquez v. North County Transit DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Cheong v. AntablinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Calatayud v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Distefano v. ForesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API