Legal Opinion

United States v. Cogan

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 2, 1966No. M 11 188PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKEL, District Judge.

The respondent, by a grand jury subpoena duces tecum addressed to him as “Custodian of the Records,” has been commanded to produce the books and records of six partnerships. He says, and the Government agrees, that he is “the target” of the grand jury’s investigations. He has appeared before the grand jury, invoked his privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment, and refused to produce the papers. The Government moves for an order compelling compliance; respondent resists the motion and asks that the subpoena be quashed. The contested issue is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States of America and Carl Rosen, Revenue Agent of the Internal Revenue Service v. Alvin I. MalnikCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. SlutskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  4. State v. DawsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces TecumDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API