Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 23, 1973No. Civ. 72-292PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BLAIR, District Judge.
In the course of an investigation of William L. Kahler by a grand jury of the District of Maryland, two subpoenae duces tecum were issued out of this court requiring the production of certain documents. The first subpoena was directed to the Custodian of Records of the law firm of Kahler, DeBlasis, Shipley & O’Malley and the second, to Walter E. Black, Jr., Esquire, an attorney for William L. Kahler. Each, in substantially identical language, directed the summoned individual to appear before the grand jury to testify and to bring with him specified…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- In Re a Grand Jury Subpoena Duces TecumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Moll v. U.S. Life Title Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974