Legal Opinion
United States v. Slutsky
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 29, 1972No. 72 Cr. 1235PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, District Judge.
This is a motion under Rule 17(c), Fed.R.Crim.P. to compel the production of business records, pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum, of a two-man partnership for use upon the trial of the partners for wilful subscription to false partnership and personal tax returns (26 U.S.C. §§ 7206(1), 7201). The defendant partners oppose the motion and move to quash the subpoena on the ground that their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination immunizes the records from production. 1 The government contends that the records are not privileged from compulsory…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- McPhaul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. IoziaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sigety v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- United States v. Ben J. Slutsky and Julius Slutsky, D/B/A "The Nevele"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. MiskinisMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Mahady & MahadyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.