Legal Opinion
Elliott v. British Tourist Authority
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 30, 2001No. 96 CIV 9154 NRBPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BUCHWALD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert Elliott (“plaintiff’ or “Elliott”) is a former employee of defendant British Tourist Authority (BTA), an agency of the British Government. Having been terminated by the BTA in March, 1996, plaintiff brought this action for age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law § 296(3)(a). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367, plaintiff also brings pendant state law claims of breach of contract and a breach of the implied covenant of good faith…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thomas Flannery v. Recording Industry Association of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Belizaire v. Rav Investigative & Security Services Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Jessamy v. City of New Rochelle, New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Bhatia v. AT & T, INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Newsom-Lang v. Warren International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.