Legal Opinion
Newsom-Lang v. Warren International, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 6, 2003No. 00 Civ. 6629LTSAJPPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWAIN, District Judge.
Before the Court is the motion of defendant Warren International, Inc. (“Defendant”) for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing plaintiffs claims and awarding Defendant costs and attorneys’ fees. Plaintiff Francis Newsom-Lang (“Plaintiff’) asserts that Defendant violated the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621-634 (West 1994 and Supp.2002), and Section 296 of the New York Executive Law (McKinney 1993 & Supp.2001), in connection with the denial of a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Risco v. McHughDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Tomney v. International Center for the Disabled & Local 815District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Lashify, Inc. v. Qingdao Network Technology CoO., LTD. a/k/a Qingdao Follow the Trend Network Technology Co., LTD. a/k/a Qingdao Mars Culture Media Co., LTD d/b/a UCOOLME and Vivicute LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026