Legal Opinion

Citizens' Bank v. Opperman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1917No. 22,832PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From St. Joseph Circuit Court; Arthur L. Hubbard, Special Judge. Action by Mary Opperman against the Citizens’ Bank of Michigan City. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, J.

— In this action appellee seeks as owner to recover by replevin a certificate for fifteen shares of the capital stock of the First National Bank of Michigan City, Indiana. At the first trial the court directed a verdict for the defendant; and from the judgment on this verdict the plaintiff appealed. The Appellate Court reversed the judgment. (Opperman v. Citizens’ Bank [1909], 44 Ind. App. 401, 85 N. E. 991). Upon the return of the cause defendant filed an amended second paragraph of answer, to which a demurrer was sustained. Upon a trial of the issue formed by the complaint and a general…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McAdams v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. New Castle Bridge Co. v. DotyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Webb v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Boland v. ClaudelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Citizens Bank of Michigan City v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blackstone Theatre Corp. v. Goldwyn Distributing Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Campion v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. McKay v. CorwineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API