Legal Opinion

Fay v. Burditt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8556PublishedCited by 34 opinions

From the Benton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

Complaint in two paragraphs for the wrongful taking and detention of personal property.

The first paragraph is in the common form and need not be further noticed. The principal questions in the case arise upon the alleged error of the circuit court in overruling the appellant’s demurrer for want of facts to the second paragraph of answer to the second paragraph of the complaint.

There is a third paragraph which alleges an unlawful conversion of the property, but no question arises under it.

The following are the substantial averments of the second paragraph, to wit: That the plaintiff is the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Behrens v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  2. Musselman v. CravensIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Nichol v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Freed v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Schuff v. RansomIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. McAdams v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Teegarden v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. New Castle Bridge Co. v. DotyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API