Legal Opinion
Caquelin v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 17, 2015No. 14-37LPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rails-to-trails takings case; .liability for a taking arising upon issuance of a NITU by the STB
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
In this takings case, a Notice of Interim Trail Use (“NITU”) issued by the federal Surface Transportation Board (“STB”) authorized conversion of a portion of a railroad line located, in Hardin and Franklin Counties, Iowa and its attendant right-of-way into a public recreational trail under Section 208 of the National Trails System Act Amendments of 1983, Pub.L. No. 98-11, § 208, 97 Stat. 42 (“Trails Act”) (codified at 16 U.S.C. § 1247(d)). 1 Plaintiffs, Kenneth and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Caquelin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Sears v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Caquelin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Memmer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.