Legal Opinion

John Breuner Co. v. Bryant

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1951No. S. F. 18285PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON C. J.

Plaintiff obtained a judgment directing defendant to cancel certain charges and remove them from plaintiff’s reserve account which was maintained by defendant under the Unemployment Insurance Act. (Stats. 1935, p. 1226.) After affirmance of the judgment on appeal (John Breuner Co. v. Bryant, 35 Cal.2d 897 [218 P.2d 4]), plaintiff filed an affidavit seeking to have defendant punished for contempt for alleged failure to comply with the mandatory provisions of the judgment. The trial court discharged defendant, finding that he had complied with the judgment and was not guilty of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Superior Court of Kern Cty.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Kreling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Gale v. Tuolumne County Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Wilson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Weber v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. In Re BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Kyne v. EusticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Berry v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Wanke, Industrial, Commercial, Residential, Inc. v. KeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API