Gale v. Tuolumne County Water Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Chickering & Gregory, and Donald Y. Lamont, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, C. J.
Motion to dismiss appeal from judgment adjudging appellant guilty of contempt.
In February, 1870, O. P. Gale, the owner of a certain water ditch and water-rights in Tuolumne County, commenced an action in the district court of the fifth judicial district of this state in and for the county of Tuolumne, against the Tuolumne County Water Company (hereinafter called the “Water Company”) to enjoin the company from diverting waters from Mormon Creek. In September, 1870, a judgment in favor of plaintiff was entered in the district court, by the terms of which the defendant and its agents, employees,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- G. & C. Merriam Co. v. SaalfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Tyler v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- In re the Estate of WittmeierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Ahlers v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1899
- In re VanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Modern Barber Colleges, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- John Breuner Co. v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.