Legal Opinion

Kreling v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1941No. S. F. 16575; Crim 4353PublishedCited by 32 opinions

John J. Taaffe and Leo R. Friedman for Petitioners.

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

In these consolidated eases petitioners seek to challenge the validity of a judgment of contempt issued against them by the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The judgment of contempt arose out of a proceeding in equity in which the Attorney General sought to enjoin the wide-spread activities of the Annenberg racing news service throughout the state. The complaint for an injunction alleged that the Annenberg organization was composed of numerous branches throughout the United States, and that it was engaged in furnishing supplies and facilities used in the illegal operation of bookmaking…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Ex Parte ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People v. SeccombeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Ex parte BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Wutchumna Water Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. In re BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. BrophyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Hughes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. John Breuner Co. v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Lynch v. UhlenhoppSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API