Legal Opinion
Smith v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 26, 1952No. Civ. 19083, 19199PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Two appeals by defendant are here consolidated.
In No. 19083, defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff decreeing that a Kansas decree of divorce, as amended by a nunc pro tuna order, be made a judgment of the superior court of California.
In No. 19199, defendant appeals from an order, dated March 28, 1952, made on the recommendation of a commissioner, finding him in contempt but permitting him to purge himself on payment of certain monthly sums, and from an order, dated April 18, 1952, made after exceptions to the order of March 28, 1952, had been filed and heard, which…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- John Breuner Co. v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Bush v. BushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Gagnon Co., Inc. v. Nevada Desert InnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Martin v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Lubin v. LubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Siegal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.