Legal Opinion · Dissent

Donovan v. City of Portland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 1, 2004Published

1Dissent

ALEXANDER, J.,

with whom DANA and CALKINS, JJ., join dissenting.

[¶ 17] I respectfully dissent. Upon review of a grant of a motion for summary judgment, we are obligated to consider the evidence and reasonable inferences that may be drawn from the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom the summary judgment has been granted in order to determine if the parties’ statements of material facts and referenced evidence in the record reveal a genuine issue of material fact. Court’s opinion, ¶ 2; Lever v. Acadia Hosp. Corp., 2004 ME 85, ¶2, 845 A.2d 1178, 1179; Rogers v. Jackson,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lever v. Acadia Hospital Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  2. Adriance v. Town of StandishSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Landmark Realty v. LeasureSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  4. Rogers v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  5. Shirley Campbell and Lauren Campbell v. Washington County Technical College, James P. Morrell, and Maurice E. MardenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API